statute for jurisdiction for fifth circuit court of appeals

“General” jurisdiction, on the other hand, is appropriate where a defendant’s contact with a state has been “continuous and systematic,” even though not related to the specific issue in dispute. “Specific” jurisdiction arises from a defendant’s conduct in the state in connection with the matter at issue. There are two types of personal jurisdiction.

The Fifth Circuit analyzed whether personal jurisdiction over the defendants was proper under the Texas long arm statute, as limited by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the author and Columbia University.

Revell brought a defamation suit in the U.S. The article assigned Oliver “Buck” Revell, a former Deputy Director of the FBI residing in Texas, a central role in the conspiracy. The article alleges a conspiracy among certain members of the Reagan Administration involving the failure to stop the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland and a subsequent cover up regarding advance knowledge of the event. In this case, a Massachusetts author posted his article on an Internet bulletin board maintained by the Columbia School of Journalism. The Fifth Circuit concluded the website owner’s contacts with the state of Texas (where the lawsuit was filed) were not “substantial” and the allegedly defamatory material was not directed specifically to that state. On December 31, 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld a lower court decision dismissing plaintiff’s defamation suit over an article published on an Internet bulletin board on the grounds that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants.

Statute for jurisdiction for fifth circuit court of appeals